I've just reviewed two classic films that hold up better
than I remember them to be, as I analyzed why they are considered to be such
memorable and groundbreaking treasures of cinema, as well as personally
reminding myself why I love writing about film so much! But I haven't reviewed a
shark movie yet this summer like I always do, so it's time for me to once again
dig into Hollywood’s obscure collection of trash by reviewing a crappy shark
filmed that was picked by my work-buddy simply titled as...
A large group of college students taking a Semester at Sea
on a ship headed by Professor Franklin Babish (Charlie O'Connell) and his wife
Anne (Carmen Electra) hit a dead megamouth shark and accidentally send it to
the ship's propeller while retrieving it, resulting with the ship's hull being
damaged and the boat to slowly sink. Nearby they discover a deserted island
where they seek refuge until the ship is fixed, that seems like a perfect place
to explore and study since the island is actually an atoll. Once setting foot
on the atoll their luck begins to drastically change when they find the grounds
to be shaking, later on realizing that the atoll is about to sink into the ocean
floor. Their hopes for the ship being repaired for them to leave the atoll
before it's completely sunk becomes highly unlikely when the ship's ONLY
mechanic gets devoured by a giant two-headed shark who craves to feast on the
helpless and naughty students stranded in the shark's territory.
The idea of having a giant great white shark with two heads does sound like a goofy yet amusing concept when being put on paper. This is
pretty much the shark in "JAWS" as if he was as big as Moby Dick and had twice as
many teeth and brain power, it sounds awesome. But the execution on the other hand is quite boring. All the shark does is swim, and eat double of what an average
shark can chew and that's pretty much it. It doesn't seem to make much of a
difference in terms of behaviors if it has two brains or not since the creature behaves
like any other shark you'd see in these kind of movies; or even so much as having
two heads given the shark's unusual size where it would seem more than
likely that he can eat just as many victims with one head attached to giant body as he could with two heads which
makes the idea very pointless and not all that interesting. As poorly executed
as "Ghost Shark" and "Sharknado" were they are at least
imaginative and offered more variety than what this film gives us. The
"Sharknado" can suck up numerous victims as the sharks inside the tornado
would either eat the people inside it, or fall in various locations to devour
anybody it encounters; a Ghost Shark can only materialize when water is present
leading to many different and bizarre scenarios; a two-headed shark just
follows and eats a couple of people at once that aren't as massive when
compared to what the other sharks can do, as well as many shark movies that
came out before the three films that I've mentioned. The idea of a two-headed shark is just as
creative as Timmy from "The Fairly Oddparents" wishing to be a crab
with two heads.
If you've read my previous reviews on modern day shark
movies, or seen one for yourself, the CGI for the shark is as bottom of the
barrel awful as you would expect it to be, along with the rest of the film's
CGI garbage that makes this boring concept even more uninteresting for how
obviously digitized it looks to the point where you know that nothing is really
there. Some of this animation is so ugly that it oddly enough made the crappy
3-D effects in "JAWS 3" look legitimately grotesque. The only time I ever
found it to be amusing for how bad it is, is seeing the characters suddenly turn into
video game characters for the Ps3/Xbox 360 as their being eaten for how obvious
the graphics look despite how hard the film tries to distant and blur the
images of the characters underwater. And what's even worse about the film's
computer effects and making the shark look less scary or fun to look at is how
inconstant its size is. It'll at times be as big as a boat, other times it will
be appear to be average size only slightly bigger than a typical shark, and
sometimes it would do the impossible by being able to somehow attack people in
waist deep water! Does this shark also have some kind of super power to change
size? It makes as much sense as having one or two moments when we see blood
oozing out of its mouth when it munches on absolutely nothing.
I will give the film this in terms of effects; it's one of
the very few modern shark films I've seen to use some kind of practical
effects. In some shots as the shark attacks its victims, will get a few quick
shots of a giant shark puppet with the actors interacting with it. That's not
to say that they aren't as cheap as the CGI, because it's just as horrendous. The design for the shark looks rubbery and beat-up, and comes off as so lifeless that you get the impression that the actors and the effects team are moving the shark. Its looks so bad that the shark in "JAWS: The Revenge" or
the exploding shark in Batman from 1966, look more life-like than this. And
given how often the film relies on its CGI, no matter how fast the shots of the
puppetry used for the shark are shown, they always stick out like a sore thumb
for how incredibly different they are to the effect that the film loves to use and
exploit the most!
With the averagely boring bad effects aside, the way the
film is shot and edited is just as annoying, pretentious, and sleazy as those
elements are in "Psycho Shark". During an attack as we're presented
with terrible fast editing and hideous effects, most of the shots that we'd see
during these scenes are shots of the ocean being filled with blood. And not as
in we're seeing these shots with the shark and its prey; I mean just shots of
the water filled with blood before cutting back to seeing the attack where the
film does it so much that nearly half-way through the film they don't just get
irritating, but the blood effects look more and more like red dye where even
the shots that show the actors acting with the blood as they're being attacked
gets worse and worse for how bad the acting is, and how overused everything
else supporting the scenes are. Thankfully I'm glad that the film doesn't keep
cutting to black and cutting back to seeing a bit of the attack as shown in the
film's opening scene. That was insufferable and nowhere near as clever as how
"Open Water" used that trick (pretty much because that film had an
atmosphere and a scenario that gave reason to why the scene kept blacking out
as the suspense surrounding it felt more realistic and less gimmicky)! However
none of those shots are not as insufferable as the film’s excessive love for
jump cuts and dissolves that are clearly not needed for whenever they are used.
You pretty much see them in most of the scenes when a good half of the
characters are together walking, getting on a life boat, heading towards the
atoll, or just simply standing! I swear to god that they're some of the worst
uses of these filming techniques that I've ever seen for how long, repetitive,
and out of the blue they are! And hey, did I mention that this film also loves
to use the shaky cam? How desperate is this film to make the attacks look less
fake when it's only making them more obvious for using almost all the annoying
editing and filming cliches in the book?! Alright, they do use the shaky cam to
help create the effect for the ground shaking, which is understandable for why it's
being used, but everything supporting these scenes such as the cheap and
clearly added-in sound effects, the crappy CGI, and the actors not looking that
frightened by it as they pretend to stumble from the vibration are so horrific
that you become more aware of the film's manipulation, giving you the
impression that somebody is literally shaking the camera as opposed to the
ground actually shaking. As for those of you who wondering if this film rips
anything off from "JAWS", it uses very little. There's the underwater POV shot that looks
like watching the opening credits to "JAWS" on fast forward; we get
some shots of peoples legs in the water; and there is an explosion at the end that’s
done by implausible convenient luck; otherwise that's it. It has as much JAWS
references as "Psycho Shark" had, and that film is alternatively
called "JAWS in Japan"!
And do you know what else that this film and "Psycho
Shark" have in common? This film is nearly as perverted, from its bikini
shots, images of women's butts whether it's underwater or them walking, and
women being shot and edited in fashion as if they are posing for Playboy
magazine or a beer commercial as we'd get music that you'd most likely hear in stripper
clubs. The actress who spends most of her time looking sexy
is Carmen Electra who is simply the film's eye candy. And for some of you pervs
reading this wondering if she reveals anything, she doesn't. In fact there's
only one scene in the movie where the characters get naked and show their breasts,
and that's when three of them go skinny dipping as the two girls make-out to
attract the guy joining them that's then interrupted by the shark implausibly
swimming up to them in shallow water, and eating the two girls as we watch them
twitch and ooze out blood from their mouths before being tugged underwater
(that also appears to look sexy for how badly acted the scene is where the
girls seem to be shaking their body and boobs intentionally instead of looking
to be in pain, even with the blood present). So if you're expecting this film
to be just as sleazy as "Psycho Shark" in hopes to get you through
all this crap, you're going to be highly disappointed.
Now I've mentioned that there's very little creativity when
it comes to seeing people being axed off, however that doesn't mean that the
film doesn't have some laughable moments that stand-out. There's of course the
skinny dipping scene that I just mentioned, that's weird, silly, cheesy, and
sexy; a scene where two girls are running from the shark on land as the atoll
is sinking where they stand on a dock thinking that they've escaped the shark
as incredibly sappy music plays with the girls acting unnaturally happy until
the shark devours them, that is so clear as bad as this movie is that they're going
to die for where they're standing, how little we know these characters, and
overly happy the scene is that it's hilarious; and a moment when the shark
bites the mechanics leg that somehow doesn't bleed, get torn off, or the victim
looking hurt in anyway showing how weak of a villain the shark is, despite
being so gigantic, fierce and having more than one head. These scenes are the
real highlights of the movie that gave me a legitimate laugh when compared to
other shark movies, which is saying something from my viewing experience, even
if there's so very few of those moments.
When diving into characters there are at least over 25 of
them on this voyage where only a few of them stand-out, as most of them only
exist to be shark food with little to no depth or personality being given to them.
The characters who leave some kind of impression are the Professor and his hot wife, the muscle
flexing "Jersey Shore" reject Cole, Paul the nerd, and Brooke Hogan
as Kate who's afraid of the water and sharks, and foolishly hopes that this
voyage will help her conquer her fears. Unfortunately there's nothing much to
them for how bland, and generic they are. The acting as I established many
times in the review is indeed as bad as you can imagine in a film like this to be.
You'll have your average overreactions to the shark and the people he kills for
how comically phoned in they are, as well as a few nonchalant moments of people
screaming and gazing at the terror before them as if it's not that big of the
deal. The unnatural expressions to the events happening around them only gets
worse when we see them huddle together and talk about how they are going to
deal with the situation, that contain so many pauses where their break-downs
and how they communicate feels so unnatural that you get the sense that the
actors are waiting more for their queues to speak and yet keep missing the
moment when they are supposed to deliver their lines for how delayed it is. The
worst actor in the movie who I wanted to see get devoured but knew that it
wasn't going to happen since very few leads in these shark movies gets killed
is Brooke Hogan who comes off as bored and annoyed rather than a woman that's
trying to conquer her fears. Her I don't care attitude is almost as emotionless
as Tara Reid in "Sharknado" except that it's not as robotic.
If you’re looking to watch a movie about a shark with two
heads with no quality what-so-ever, you'll definitely get it, and in a nutshell
that's really what you have to expect in shark movies of these kind. Being a
big fan of horror movies who always looks to find some kind of entertainment
value in the awful ones, for some reason I just can't get into these kind of
shark movies, because there's little worth seeing or coming back too for how
unexciting and obnoxious they are, and this movie is no exception. The effects
are so generically bad that they aren't interesting to look at; the concept of a two-headed
shark is surprisingly boring; the characters are mostly disposable as the ones
who stand-out are very dull; there
are very few attacks that come across as funny or cool to look at; the acting is bad and
is hardly ever laughable; and all the camera tricks that the film tries to
use to hide how fake these attacks look, and try to give the film some kind of identity
is more annoying that it is helping the film. I can see why people find
entertainment value in these crappy shark movies, and I sincerely wish that I could
find at least one bad shark movie that can do the same for me (that isn't a JAWS sequel), but until then, this one
can be thrown into the ocean along with the other bad shark movies that I
reviewed for good old Bruce to eat.
No comments:
Post a Comment