With the latest "Star Wars" film becoming a Blockbuster hit both financially and critically, as well as being well received by the fans of the franchise; I say after all these years, it's time for me to finally review the last live action "Star Wars" film that hit the big screen before "The Force Awakens"...
When my Brother Jack and I did our "Top Ten Favorite Film Series" lists, I put the original "Star Wars Trilogy" on the list and
talked about "The Phantom Menace" being my first "Star
Wars" film that I ever saw and got the opportunity to see in theaters
as a kid, where I found myself so bored by it, that I fell asleep in my chair,
which as a result scared me away from watching any other "Star Wars"
movie, since I thought they were just visually good looking films with action that has
boring characters and dialogue, where it’s only purpose is to sell toys. It wasn't
until the 5th grade when I started taking an interest in the classic "Star
Wars" trilogy, and coincidentally during that same year when I finally saw
the original "Star Wars" films, "Star Wars Episode 3: Revenge Of
The Sith" came out , the "Star Wars" prequel that shows Anakin finally becoming Darth Vader. Despite
that I didn't think it was going to be good, I went to see it anyway with a few of my
friends, and after I saw the film, I surprisingly found myself enjoying it
almost as much as I enjoyed the original trilogy. To be honest though, I
haven't watched the film since I last saw it in theaters and after reviewing
and currently re-watching the first two movies from the Prequel trilogy, is it really the only good movie
in the Prequel trilogy, or is it just as mediocre as the other two films with
only a few kickass moments and good visual effects; ON WITH THE REVIEW!
Before I talk about the plot, I got to talk about the first
24 minutes of the movie. Before the film gets down to its actual plot, much
like in "Return Of The Jedi", the first 20 minutes or so of the movie
is one big rescue mission, only instead of our heroes Anakin (Hayden
Christensen) and Obi-Wan Kenobi (Ewan McGregor) saving a close friend, a fellow
Jedi, or Anakin's love interest Padme (Natalie Portman); they instead have to
save Supreme Chancellor Palpatine (Ian McDiarmid) who will soon become the evil
Emperor that will use Anakin for his evil doing. I have to say that as a kid
who was bored and unamused by the opening of "The Phantom Menace" when it was released in theaters; when I saw this
opening on the big screen I was completely sucked into the action that was taking place in front me. And as an
adult who hasn't seen this opening sequence since I saw it in theaters, I'm not only
still sucked into the action, but at the
same time I’m very impressed with it. After re-watching "The Phantom
Menace" and "Attack Of The Clones", despite that they both
carried some sort of action in the opening scenes, I still found myself bored by
both of them for how slow and unexciting the opening scene in "Phantom
Menace" was; and how painfully brief and unemotional Padme's assassination
attempt was. With this opening on the other hand, right after the opening
crawl, the action and excitement starts off right away as we get a Starship
space battle, lightsaber fights against Droids and the Jedi who cut off Anakin's hand Count Dooku (Christopher
Lee), a new and cool looking cyborg type of
villain named General Grievous (Matthew Wood),CGI that's overused but not as
cartoony and video game looking as it looked in the last few films; R2-D2 for
the first time fighting (Though I do question what happened to most his gadgets
in the events that happen after this movie), and humor that's actually funny
instead of coming off as stale or childishly juvenile (even though “Attack Of
The Clones” did have one or two funny scenes). Even the opening crawl that starts
out the movie had me interested in what I was reading which as a
result got me hyped into seeing what was going to happen; when the opening
crawl in the last two films was the first sign that the film’s were going to be
dull and boring with it's constant talk of politics. This opening literally did
have that "Star Wars" feel to it with its action, camp, humor, imagination, and
epic and gigantic look. The only downside to this opening is the acting is still pretty wooden,
but it’s not as horrible as it was in the previous two films or how it's going
to get later on in the film.
So with the first 24 minutes being pretty much a big rescue
mission that could in all honestly be an episode for one of those TV animated
spin-off shows based on the "Star Wars Prequel Trilogy", what's the film's
actual story? A few years after the events of "Attack Of The Clones",
Anakin and his secret wife Padme discover that they’re going to have a baby,
but as excited and yet worried Anakin is about having a baby, he has nightmares
of Padme dying when giving childbirth, which are the same nightmares that he
had of his Mother dying that eventually came true. After Anakin's heroic rescue
of saving Supreme Chancellor Palpatine, he becomes close friends with Palpatine
where Palpatine happily suggests that Anakin become a master Jedi, which
intrigues Anakin, but the Jedi Council decline Anakin's wishes. However,
the Jedi Council suspect something suspicious about Palpatine and order Anakin
to keep an eye on him. Eventually Anakin discovers that Palpatine is a Sith
Lord and is torn with whether he should turn him to the Jedi Council or use the Dark Side
to save his Wife's life; but as you may have guessed, Anakin does eventually
become Darth Vader and the Sith Lord along with his Clone army figure that it's
time to wipe out all of the Jedi, so that the Sith Lord can rule the galaxy. As
all this is going on, Obi-Wan and Yoda are at different planets doing Jedi
missions that have no importance to the actual plot of the film, where those scenes only exist
to give them something to do as Anakin becomes Darth Vader.
I have to admit, after watching the two previous films from
the "Prequel Trilogy" where they both had a boring and half-baked story-line (though I'll admit, I did find myself semi-interested in the events
of "Attack Of The Clones", even if the majority of it was boring and
in all honesty pretty pointless); this film feels like that George Lucas actually
did have a story to tell! The reason for Anakin joining the dark side is an interesting
and tragic story-arc; the film isn't as flooded with talk on politics like the last
two films were; the story is easy to follow; and quite honestly, even if
you didn't see the first two movies from the "Prequel Trilogy" you
can still understand and grasp what's going on and what the characters have
been through in the past! Even when I first saw the film in theaters with a
vague memory of "Phantom Menace" and never ever took the time to watch
"Attack Of The Clones", I still understood this film fine. Still as
much as I praise the story, that doesn't mean that I don't have problems with
it! The close friendship that Anakin has with Palpatine after his rescue feels
very sudden, and while I understand Anakin’s reason to turn to the dark the
side, his transformation feels painfully rushed to the point where the film felt
like that they got to quickly go through this story-arc so that Anakin can become fully evil,
rather then having him slowly become evil. I mean you could have cut out or
shorten a lot of things in this film to make his transformation feel genuine,
instead of just rushing it. It literally takes him no time for him to start
slaughtering kids who are Jedi's in training right after when he's knighted as Darth Vader, the very same evening when he's against killing someone since it's not the Jedi code. I know that the Jedi Council hasn't
treated him too well, and that he's doing all this evil to eventually
learn the power of saving his wife from death with Palpatine's help, but to go
off and mercilessly slaughter kids who have done him no wrong without even having so
much as a look of remorse on his face as he's about to kill them is pretty hard to buy that
he would be this easily manipulated to become fully evil.
Like I said when I described the plot, there are a few plot
threads that seem pointless and the ones that stand out to me the most that I
mentioned earlier are the two missions that Obi-Wan and Yoda are given. I get
that the purpose is for them to be away from the massacre that happens later on
in the film and for them to not interfere with Anakin's transformation at
becoming Darth Vader, and honestly I would forgive these scenes if Anakin's
transformation to the Dark Side felt natural and flowing instead of forced, and
that the missions themselves that these Jedi’s go on had some cool and intense
action, but sadly that's not the case here. The mission that Yoda goes on is to
aide the Wookies in some kind of out of nowhere battle, and while it is cool to
finally see a Wookie Planet with an army of Wookies that Chewbacca’s in, the
reason for this battle just comes out of nowhere, and the battle itself is
pretty boring and extremely brief. As for Obi-Wan's mission, he has to fight
the villain who we saw earlier in the film, General Grievous. As much as I like Grievous'
design; cold robotic voice; and the fact that he can wield four lightsabers at
once, that for me isn't enough for me to overlook how forced and out of nowhere
of a villain he is! As forced and brief as Darth Maul and Count Dooku were as
villains, we at least knew something about their past and even had a bit of
build-up before meeting one of them; with Grievous on the other hand, he just
comes in right out of nowhere from the very start as a supporting antagonist
who we hardly know anything about, except for the fact that he's a powerful
Droid leader who works for Palpatine and Count Dooku. Now I know that there's
an animated TV Show that takes place and even made between Episode 2 and 3
called "Clone Wars" that explains Grevious' presence in this movie, that even shows a bit more of Anakin's signs of turning to the dark side, but in
my opinion, unless if the movie is animated, the spin-off animated TV show
shouldn't even be a requirement for you to enjoy and understand a full length
live action movie that's literally called "Episode 3" which is clearly implying
that it's a direct sequel to the last movie. I already said that you can still
understand and grasp what's going on in the film fine without seeing the first
two films, and yeah I still stand by that completely. But after seeing
"Attack Of The Clones" where the main villain was Count Dooku, to now
suddenly having this out of nowhere villain with no mention or build-up to him
in the last movie, where your only source of information and requirement to
understand his presence and character in the movie is an animated cartoon show
with a completely different look, to me seems like a lazy and phoned in
way to give this film a new villain, where he should be both introduced and
killed off on the TV Spin-off show alone! As for the whole lightsaber battle between
him and Obi-Wan, it's ok but nothing really that special, nor does he really
seem that big of a match for Obi-Wan despite that he's a robot carrying four
lightsabers!
When it comes to acting in this movie, it's pretty hit and miss.
It's still bland and wooden; the romantic scenes between Anakin and Padme are
still really corny along with that cheap lovey-dovey dialogue that the actors are given; the scenes that the
film has of political talk, as little as there are, are still unengaging; whenever
Anakin speaks when he expresses his anger during the climax is laughable, than
it is intimidating; and James Earl Jones voicing Anakin in the Darth Vader
suit, insultingly enough sounds just as whiny and bland as Christensen's performance, especially
when he shouts out the word "NOOOO"! With that said, there is a type
of acting that works to the film's advantage of expressing emotions and telling
the story visually and that’s when the characters don't talk! Whenever they're
given a scene to just silently express emotion and talk very little, that's
when the acting becomes very effective. Anakin's evil look and stair when he's consumed
by the Dark Side is very intimidating and even at times scary to look at;
whenever Anakin and Padme are given a scene where they don't speak or speak
very little like the Window scene or Anakin’s reaction to her pregnancy for
example are pretty emotional and surprisingly at times realistic; and even Jar
Jar's 2 second cameo at the end who doesn't say anything looks legitimately
depressed, rather then being his old annoying Jar-Jar self! Say what you want
about Lucas' bad directing after all these years, but at least he does know how
to direct actors with showing their emotions without any dialogue along with the
visuals and music by John Williams to help convey those emotions so beautifully.
I will also admit that out of all the wooden performances in this movie,
there is one actor who somehow rises above Lucas' direction to makes the
characters act and sound boring whenever they speak...
Sadly no, and it's a pity too because I know he can act really well without resorting to his over the top hot headed Samuel L. Jackson self.
Close, because ever since "Attack Of The Clones", McGregor does
look and sound what Obi-Wan Kenobi would be like as a young Jedi. But still
no cigar, considering that his delivery is still painfully dull.
Alright yes, but he's not in the film long enough to truly shine.
Yes, Ian McDiarmid as freaking Palpatine! In the last two films, I found him
to be very boring (Even during the scenes when he's wearing the hood to cover his face), and going back to this film again, I expected him to
be both dull and over the top annoying since that’s the majority of the acting in
these films; but once I saw him in the opening scene of the movie where he
manipulates Anakin into killing the guy who cut off his hand, that's when I
knew that his performance was going to be different from his lifeless and once
faced performance that he carried in the last two films. His scenes of manipulating Anakin whether
they are subtle and direct is very convincing, despite how painfully rushed
those scenes along with the story are; his interaction with Anakin where he
acts all friendly and calm looks very legit, instead of feeling dull and
staged; and when he finally does become the deformed faced Emperor he still looks
and acts just as intimidating as he was in "Return Of The Jedi"! Even
when he goes full out over the top, as silly as it is, he's still a lot of fun
to watch. It's almost as if McDiarmid compared his last two performances in the
"Star Wars" prequels to his first performance as the Emperor in
"Return Of The Jedi" and said "Screw George's direction, I'm
going to give the fans and newcomers of the franchise the same classic evil
performance that I gave them before in “Return Of The Jedi", where as a
result Lucas just liked what he saw as he was filming these scenes and put
them in the movie! McDiarmid just really gives an all around great performance throughout this movie! His best scene in the whole entire movie is
surprisingly not one of his scenes after when he becomes the deformed faced
Emperor, but instead is actually one of his earlier scenes in the movie that takes
place in the Opera House/Circus (I don’t know which) as he tells Anakin a story
about the Dark Side using their powers to cheat death that's written and acted
so well that I found myself taking an interest in what I was hearing. It didn't
at all feel like any of that corny love dialogue or uninteresting talk of Space
politics that I've been hearing throughout the films, this is legitimately very amusing stuff that's acted out quite effectively. Now what the hell are they watching that involves giant bubbles, I have no clue, but I don't care since that weird bubble show that looks boring to watch (where
the characters themselves looked bored by it) just adds to the atmosphere to this scene!
In the previous two films, whenever they would make a scene be dark,
gritty, and depressing, it would usually fall flat for how boring and unemotional
it all looks and feels. With this film on the other hand, once Anakin joins the
Dark Side as we see constant battles and Jedi's being massacred, the music, the
visuals, and expressive acting looks and feels so dark and gloomy that honestly
not since "The Empire Strikes Back" did I see a "Star Wars"
film this dark and depressing! Looking at all these violent and depressing
looking visuals with a tragic and downbeat story to go along with it
is no wonder why the film got a PG-13 rating. Though to be honest, I think it
was the idea of Anakin murdering innocent children is what made the censors
rate this film a PG-13! The action in this movie are pretty hit and
miss like the acting. The opening sequence was great; the climatic fight between Anakin and
Obi-Wan is awesome given where the fight takes place at; and the fight between
Yoda and Palpatine who are both masters of the light and dark side of the force is actually pretty cool. Sadly though, we get a boring and pointless
battle of Wookies fighting; a duel against a forced villain who's very easy to
take down, along with a boring chase of Obi-Wan riding on a goofy and
cartoony looking CGI creature; and an awkwardly choreographed fight of
Palpatine fighting against Mace Windu. I should also note that aside from the
younglings that Anakin kills, we don't see him kill any other Jedi to show how
powerful and in touch he is with the Dark Side, which is pretty lame if you ask
me! The CGI looks a little less video game like as it did in the previous
films, but it's still on a handful of occasions just as cartoony as it looked
in the other films where you wonder why Lucas isn't using practical effects for
half of these special effects. I will give Lucas credit though for him building sets
that resemble the sets to the original "Star Wars" movies to make it
feel like that the film is launching into "A New Hope"! Actually,
despite a few goofy moments and things that don't make too much sense in the
last few minutes of the movie, I did get the vibe of watching one of the original "Star Wars" films!
I have to say after watching this along with the other two films from
"The Prequel Trilogy" again, this film is hands down the superior
film of the trilogy that comes really close to feeling like a "Star
Wars" film! Yes there is a lot wrong with it that holds it back from being
good movie, but there's still enough right with it to make it watchable and engaging! Originally during my first two years
of reviewing movies on my "Facebook" page, I gave both "The Phantom
Menace" and "Attack Of The Clones" a 3/5 for being very hit and
miss movies, but after re-watching these films again, it's clear to me that
this is the film that has a good chunk of hits and misses that makes it all
become entertaining and investing, while the first two films only had 1 or 2
good scenes that take forever to get too. It may not be a good movie, but
honestly I can see myself watching this movie a few more times (maybe even
purchasing it for my collection) than I see myself watching the other films
from the trilogy. And considering the fact that it's not heavily reacquired for you to
see the previous two films by order for you to understand what's going on in the film is part of the reason of what makes watching this film so enjoyably satisfying!
RE-RATING FOR "THE PHANTOM MENACE" AND "ATTACK OF THE CLONES": 2/5
RATING FOR "REVENGE OF THE SITH": 3/5
OVERALL ON THE "STAR WARS PREQUEL TRILOGY"
After re-rating the first two films that I reviewed from the "Star
Wars Prequel Trilogy", and finding myself still enjoying the third and final
installment to the Trilogy, how is it as a whole? Well let’s
start with the stuff that makes this Trilogy infamous and pale in comparison
from the original “Star Wars Trilogy”. The first and obvious problem that these
three films have is the acting! I know that the acting in the Original Trilogy
is a bit stilted and over the top but the characters are so well written and
the actors portraying them fit their roles so perfectly that they give the characters
that their portraying a lot personality that it doesn't matter if the acting
can get clunky and goofy at times. In this series on the other hand, the acting
is so wooden and monotone as the actors are flooded with
dialogue revolving around politics, corny and cheap romantic talk, unfunny humor with
stale delivery, and lines that make you question what Lucas was thinking when
he wrote it, that it's pretty boring and uninteresting. Hardly anyone gives a
good performance that's memorable or interesting, especially in "The
Phantom Menace", which in my opinion is where the bland acting for these
films are at their worst! It even depresses me that the characters from the
previous films like Yoda and C-3PO who are both voiced by their original actors
lack the humor and charm that they brought in the previous films! When we're not
being flooded with boring emotionless acting, we have to sit through CGI space
creatures that look fake to the point where you can tell that the actors aren't
interacting with them, as the characters themselves either come off as
insufferably annoying and childish with the juvenile humor that they're given
as they talk like children; racially offensive stereotypes; or are just as
boring as the live actors! Who can also forget the insufferably annoying Jar-Jar
Binks that many fans of the franchise hate to death! In all
honesty, despite how much I bash this character, I actually do feel sorry for the
actor voicing him since he has to suffer from all the hate that fans and
critics (Including myself) give to the character that he's portraying! I really hope that this man
can one day redeem himself, which I strongly encourage him to do so! While I'm on
the topic of the CGI creatures; the over-use of CGI for these films are so fake, so cartoony, and so video game like that it just makes me wonder why Lucas didn't just animate the
Prequels if he wants to express his true vision of the “Star Wars” universe without any limitations! He
did it with the animated Spin-Off shows based on "The Prequel
Trilogy" where it seems more welcoming, but with a live action film series
that hardly uses any practical effects when there are so many practical means at creating these effects to only instead use CGI that looks painfully obvious,
that it to me just seems like he could have just animated these films from the
minute he started writing the story for "The Phantom Menace"! Finally
we go to the story for these films and man are they for the most part lazily
written and hardly ever intriguing! The politics in these movies are focused on
way too much, instead being brought up in a simplistic way, like what the
original trilogy did with its politics; the love story between Anakin and Padme is
forced, corny, awkward, and even at times creepy; the stories themselves feel
very rushed, especially Anakin's story-arc to the dark side; there are some
continuity errors (Especially in “Revenge Of The Sith” sadly) that go against
what the original films showed and told us (I'm only strictly speaking in terms
of the films, not the books, expanded universes, TV Shows, or any of that
jazz); and showing me things that I honestly didn't wish to see or want to know!
But as much as I bash on these films, that doesn't mean that there isn't some good
things that you can appreciate from them. Yes, I did just talk about the things
that you can appreciate from the third and final movie of the Trilogy (which I won’t bother repeating myself of what they are), but even in the first two films as pointless
as they are, do have a few things worth seeing, like the Podrace and the fight
against Darth Maul in "The Phantom Menace"; and the Clone Wars battle
in "Attack Of The Clones". Aside from Ian Mcdiarmid's performance in
the 3rd film and Christopher Lee as Count
Dooku in the second and third movie; another character who I found myself starting to appreciate is Darth Maul.
Yes he hardly has a personality, and yes he's in "The Phantom Menace" very little, but much like characters like Luca Brasi in "The Godfather", The Joker's henchman Bob in Tim Burton's "Batman", or even Bobba Fett in the original "Star Wars Trilogy", who are characters that hardly say or do anything, but are so cool and badass whenever they are present and given something to do that they just leave this huge impression on you, Darth Maul is actually no exception in that category. His design is awesome; he may not speak much, but his presence feels intimidating; and he's a highly skilled Jedi of the Dark Side who carries probably the coolest lightsaber ever. The Score by John Williams for these movies is also just as epic as it sounded
in the original films, even if it doesn't mostly save these films from the
bland acting and boring story-lines (with the exception of the third film)! But out of everything that I just talked about, the two things that I really admire from the whole entire Prequel series that
I think should be appreciated whether you like the films or not are how much more we get to see of the "Star
Wars" universe, and the upgraded lightsaber fights. I'm not saying those
are all perfect either since the CGI for these different worlds at times does
look painfully digitized, while the lightsaber fights are hit and miss in terms
of fun and excitement, but they did do something that the original series
couldn't do. Instead of being grounded to an imaginative set with creative
characters lurking about, we get to see the cities and landscapes that look big
and gigantic, even if they are in CGI. Instead of just having two guys tapping
lightsabers, as cool as it was in the original films with the emotions
supporting those scenes, we get stylized lightsaber fights with flips, kicks, dangerous
obstacles surrounding their environment, and having the villains either carry
more then one lightsaber or having a totally different type of lightsaber.
Still as good as the stuff that the "Prequel Trilogy" does deliver, it
still sadly doesn't save them from being good movies. Even "Revenge Of The
Sith" as much as I enjoyed it and recommend it out of all the films in the Trilogy for getting more right than what the other films did, I still
don't think it's a good movie for the things that I faulted it for. I know that
the Original Trilogy as great and groundbreaking as it is isn't pitch perfect either,
but it has so much more to offer when compared to these films, especially in terms
of character and story, which are two of the main ingredients of making a great
movie, unlike these films where they are more based on style over substance (even
if the 3rd film was close to having both) and as a front for Lucas to sell tons
of merchandise based off of the movie “Where the real money for the movie is
made”. I once again only recommend "Revenge Of The Sith" for the
reasons that I pointed out in my review, even if it's not that good of a movie;
but for the good things that can be found in "Phantom Menace" and
"Attack Of The Clones", I guess they are worth a look, that is if you're
willing to sit through a lot and I mean a lot of B.S. to get to the good parts!
For me personally, I'll just stick to the original trilogy, and occasionally watch
"Revenge Of The Sith" as my guilty pleasure, while with the other
films (not counting "The Force Awakens" since I haven't seen it yet)
despite a few good things that they have brought, I in all honesty can care less
about them.
OVERALL RATING FOR "STAR WARS PREQUEL TRILOGY" 2/5
No comments:
Post a Comment